Can the SEC Sue Ripple Again? Here’s What Legal Experts Say

Can the SEC Sue Ripple Again? Here’s What Legal Experts Say


The post Can the SEC Sue Ripple Again? Here’s What Legal Experts Say appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

The SEC formally closed its case against Ripple in August 2025, keeping a $125 million fine. Legal experts say the doctrine of res judicata blocks the SEC from suing Ripple again on the same claims. A U.S. court ruled that XRP itself is not a security, limiting future SEC arguments. Recent reports from Washington have raised fresh questions about whether the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could reopen its case against Ripple. The short answer from legal experts: no, not on the same issues. Lawmakers Question SEC’s Crypto Enforcement In a letter dated January 15, 2026, several House Democrats criticized U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins for scaling back crypto enforcement. The lawmakers said the SEC has dropped or paused more than a dozen major crypto cases since 2025, including actions involving Ripple Labs, Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken. They warned that political donations from crypto executives linked to President Donald Trump could create the appearance of a “pay-to-play” system. Ripple Case Comes Back Into Focus Among the cases mentioned was the SEC’s long-running lawsuit against Ripple. That case largely ended in 2023, when a federal judge ruled that XRP itself is not a security and made key distinctions between different types of XRP sales. In August 2025, the SEC said it had closed its case against Ripple Labs, keeping the $125 million fine in place. The latest political pressure on the SEC led some investors to wonder if the agency could try again. Why the Ripple Case Can’t Be Reopened Legal expert Bill Morgan says the answer is clear: the SEC cannot relitigate the Ripple case on the same grounds. Morgan pointed to a legal principle called res judicata, which prevents the same parties from reopening a case once it has been finally decided. He explained that…



Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *